Legacy SOAR: The Pain and The Remedy

A modern Security Operations Center (SOC) environment houses a complex symphony of tools, technologies, and talent. It encompasses a myriad of advanced detection and monitoring systems, threat intelligence platforms, incident response tools, and forensic capabilities, all working in tandem. Additionally, with the integration of cloud services, hybrid architectures, and an ever-growing IoT ecosystem, SOC operations are continuously evolving. Skilled professionals, from threat hunters to incident responders, navigate this intricate web, ensuring the organization's digital assets remain secure amidst a constantly shifting threat landscape.

In their battle against shape-shifting cyber threats, SOC teams have increasingly come to rely on Security Orchestration, Automation, and Response (SOAR) tools to streamline processes, enhance threat detection, and automate responses. Their ability to integrate various security tools, provide centralized visibility, and facilitate swift incident resolution has revolutionized how SOCs operate. However, as with any evolving technology, there are challenges to address.

Legacy SOAR’s Lackluster Outcomes

Legacy SOAR solutions grapple with numerous issues like manual workflows, slow threat responses, and difficulties adapting to diverse and complex IT environments.

The essence of security orchestration lies in providing a connecting fabric between the numerous moving parts of a SOC environment. Historically, SOAR solutions have failed to deliver on the promise of comprehensive integrations across the security technology stack. When SOAR features are merely tagged on case management, point solutions, or other security platforms, the result can be a patchwork of functionalities that lack cohesion. This approach often leads to integration challenges, where different solutions, each designed with its own unique architecture and protocols, struggle to communicate seamlessly.

With this piecemeal approach to SOAR, security practitioners have to make do with limited orchestration capabilities, reliant on manual, disjointed workflows. The risk of human error also increases with manual processes, potentially leading to security oversights.

Vendor lock-in and the lack of native integrations with diverse tools also result in operational inefficiencies and missed opportunities for centralized threat visibility and cross-functional insights. Besides suffering from efficiency and scalability issues, legacy platforms are not designed to adapt to the diverse IT environments of today, which include cloud, on-premises, and hybrid infrastructures. The inability to adapt can lead to blind spots in security coverage and hamper SOC teams from developing uniform response strategies.

Moreover, older SOAR solutions often operate on predefined rules that might not account for newer threat vectors, making them inherently reactive. The lack of proactive threat hunting capabilities can leave organizations vulnerable to emerging threats. A subpar tool isn't merely an inconvenience; it causes a ripple effect of diminished productivity across all security functions. Delayed or reactive threat response, resulting from these limitations, is not just a blemish on the efficacy of SOC teams; it can have wide-ranging negative implications on the operations of an organization.

Charting the Path Forward with Decoupled SOA+R

The cure to the SOAR ailment lies in an approach that gives security teams limitless capabilities. This can be achieved by decoupling the security orchestration and automation layer from the case management and incident response functionalities.

By implementing a dedicated orchestration solution that sits as the underlying connective tissue between various elements of the security stack, security teams can gain numerous advantages. This approach helps sidestep the complexity and limitations of older solutions where the SOAR functionality has been added on top of an existing tool built for other use cases. Unlike traditional solutions that are often tethered to specific vendors or platforms, a decoupled approach ensures seamless integration across a myriad of tools, whether they reside in the cloud or on-premises. This cloud-to-on-prem orchestration ensures that organizations can leverage the best of both worlds without compromising on security.

The modern cybersecurity landscape demands solutions that can be rapidly deployed and adapted, and this is where capabilities like low-code/no-code automation play an important role. They empower security teams to swiftly design and implement response strategies without getting bogged down by intricate coding requirements. This agility must be complemented by a consistent and unified user experience, and the ability to adapt and integrate with emerging technologies, ensuring that security operations remain robust, agile, and ahead of the curve.

The Key Takeaway

While SOAR solutions have become an integral part of the modern SOC, legacy implementations have failed to deliver desirable outcomes. Vendor lock-in, inadequate integration capabilities, tie-in with case management, and limited orchestration across hybrid infrastructures are just some of the limitations that have held back the proliferation of security automation and reduced the productivity of SOC teams. Cyware’s unique decoupled, vendor-neutral security orchestration and automation solutions are setting the new standard for next-gen automated SecOps. Despite the dynamic nature of cybersecurity challenges, Cyware’s carefully crafted solutions continue to provide organizations with a reliable technology layer upon which their security operations can thrive.